---
product_id: 45343249
title: "New Hart's Rules: The Oxford Style Guide"
brand: "anne waddingham"
price: "$102.17"
currency: USD
in_stock: true
reviews_count: 13
url: https://www.desertcart.ec/products/45343249-new-harts-rules-the-oxford-style-guide
store_origin: EC
region: Ecuador
---

# New Hart's Rules: The Oxford Style Guide

**Brand:** anne waddingham
**Price:** $102.17
**Availability:** ✅ In Stock

## Quick Answers

- **What is this?** New Hart's Rules: The Oxford Style Guide by anne waddingham
- **How much does it cost?** $102.17 with free shipping
- **Is it available?** Yes, in stock and ready to ship
- **Where can I buy it?** [www.desertcart.ec](https://www.desertcart.ec/products/45343249-new-harts-rules-the-oxford-style-guide)

## Best For

- anne waddingham enthusiasts

## Why This Product

- Trusted anne waddingham brand quality
- Free international shipping included
- Worldwide delivery with tracking
- 15-day hassle-free returns

## Description

New Hart's Rules: The Oxford Style Guide

## Images

![New Hart's Rules: The Oxford Style Guide - Image 1](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/31jwXAWP+nL.jpg)

## Customer Reviews

### ⭐⭐ 2.0 out of 5 stars







  
  
    Not a step forward or backward, but sideways into a ditch
  

*by S***H on Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on March 7, 2016*

I'm severely disappointed with this revision.  I'm all for descriptive linguistics injecting practicality into style guides, so that they reflect changes in usage and do not become stodgy and eventually irrelevant.  But this post-
  
Ritter







  
  
     edition is sorely confusing itself about what its role is, and too often just throws up its hands. A book with "Rules" on the cover has to actually provide them. It is the very nature of a style guide to be prescriptive and to offer guidance.This Waddingham edition of 'NHR' repeatedly observes differences in usage without making it clear in which registers or genres these differences operate, and then fails to recommend anything.  Too frequently it tries to draw UK vs. US distinctions that do not really exist; what is actually happening is more often academic vs. journalistic style divergence, that also *somewhat* and decreasingly lean one way or another in Commonwealth versus North American English (for that lingering amount of nationalism, you can mostly blame 
  
'Chicago Manual of Style'







  
  
     and its territorial rigidity on some things it considers "traditional" to the point of sanctity in American publishing, whether American publishing actually agrees).Parts of this new 'NHR' volume veer into adopting alleged language changes too soon, yet it remains farcically behind the times in others. Sometimes it even directly contradicts itself in the same section (e.g. in the chapter on titles of compositions, where this happens more than once, sometimes on the same page).  The only conclusion I can come to is that Waddingham was not given sufficient time for a thorough revision.  Sadly, this 2014 text is being integrated without change into the 2016 
  
'New Oxford Style Manual







  
  
     (combined with the text of the 2014 
  
'New Oxford Dictionary for Writers and Editors'







  
  
    ; this probably means we'll have to wait until sometime around 2018–2020 to see a reliable 'New Hart's'.My recommendation in the interim would be to stick with Ritter's comparatively cohesive 2005 edition of 'NHR', and the 2014 'NODWE'.  Supplement this with Butterfield's 2015 edition of 
  
'Fowler's Modern English Usage'







  
  
    , but also 
  
Burchfield's 2004 edition of same







  
  
    , since the Butterfield 'FMEU' suffers some of the same problems as the Waddingham 'NHR'. Remember that readers's expectations are actually built on what they've been reading their entire lives, not on what a style guide issued last year says, so relying on ca. 2005 material is stable strategy for some time, other than for new jargon, and new but strong shifts in usage. But you're probably already aware of them anyway.A major causative factor behind the faults in the current 'NHR' is that British journalism has no consistent style on most matters; it lacks anything like North America's 
  
'AP Stylebook'







  
  
    , which for better or worse exerts a powerful normative influence in the news and PR spheres on the western side of the Atlantic. The result is that British news publishers do whatever they want, and issue competing house-style guides with the intent of making a big show of standing out in the news marketplace (much like the 
  
'NYT Manual'







  
  
     bucking 'AP' style in the US, in ways that virtually no other publisher follows). 'New Hart's' just laps it up, reporting all these UK journo idiosyncrasies as equally valid usage, without providing any contextual cues as to what sort of writing any of them might be valid in and how widespread they are (usually not) outside a particular publisher.  'NHR' should instead stick to the core features of century-stable Oxford style, which has always been academic, aimed at book and journal publishing. (HInt to future editors: Start with Oxford U. Press's own house style, and build on that.)  If they don't, the style guides of 'The Guardian' (online), 
  
'The Economist'







  
  
    , and other British infotainment publishers are going to end up dominating. Or if we're lucky, Cambridge U. Press will shake off the dust and issue a competing, post-'Hart's', formal Commonwealth English style manual.  I know I would welcome that.

### ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 5.0 out of 5 stars







  
  
    it's perfect, no bends or tears.
  

*by A***R on Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on March 1, 2021*

thank you so much.  it came much earlier than i expected.  the combo of stamps was interesting; i'm keeping package, too.  i'm so happy.  long live france!  thank you!  i'd definitely buy again from you. lh.

### ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 5.0 out of 5 stars







  
  
    Value Book for UK Editing Conventions
  

*by P***H on Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on April 20, 2017*

I edit books here in the US and the books I edit are for UK publication, so this little book is handy. I also have the unabridged OED, so between the two, I am pretty set.This complaint is minor: I need bifocals and the print is rather small in this. I have been putting off getting an exam. So I have had to use a fresnel lens. My OED is the microprint version so they include a half-globe to enlarge the print.Great book, though I understand some people who have had earlier editions have complaints. So read through the reviews and see if this is necessary for you.

## Frequently Bought Together

- New Hart's Rules: The Oxford Style Guide
- New Oxford Dictionary for Writers and Editors
- New Oxford Spelling Dictionary

---

## Why Shop on Desertcart?

- 🛒 **Trusted by 1.3+ Million Shoppers** — Serving international shoppers since 2016
- 🌍 **Shop Globally** — Access 737+ million products across 21 categories
- 💰 **No Hidden Fees** — All customs, duties, and taxes included in the price
- 🔄 **15-Day Free Returns** — Hassle-free returns (30 days for PRO members)
- 🔒 **Secure Payments** — Trusted payment options with buyer protection
- ⭐ **TrustPilot Rated 4.5/5** — Based on 8,000+ happy customer reviews

**Shop now:** [https://www.desertcart.ec/products/45343249-new-harts-rules-the-oxford-style-guide](https://www.desertcart.ec/products/45343249-new-harts-rules-the-oxford-style-guide)

---

*Product available on Desertcart Ecuador*
*Store origin: EC*
*Last updated: 2026-02-16*